Local Government Minister Daniel Garwe has expressed strong disapproval of Bulawayo Mayor David Coltart’s recognition of Bulelani Lobengula Khumalo as the Ndebele king. Garwe emphasized that Zimbabwe’s Constitution acknowledges only chiefs, headmen, and village heads, asserting that any attempt to install a king is unconstitutional and undermines the nation’s legal framework.
The controversy stems from the Khumalo family’s decision to crown Bulelani Khumalo in a private ceremony in 2018, despite a High Court ruling that deemed the coronation illegal under Zimbabwean law. The government has consistently maintained that the Constitution does not provide for the establishment of a monarchy, and any such actions are considered null and void.
Proponents of the Ndebele monarchy argue that reinstating the kingship is vital for preserving cultural heritage and identity.
They cite examples from neighboring countries like South Africa, where traditional kings coexist with republican governance structures. However, the Zimbabwean government remains firm in its stance, citing constitutional provisions that limit traditional leadership to chiefs, headmen, and village heads.
The dispute has sparked a broader debate on cultural rights and constitutional law in Zimbabwe. While some view the government’s position as a necessary adherence to legal statutes, others see it as a suppression of cultural expression. As tensions persist, the matter underscores the complex interplay between tradition and modern governance in the country.
